Interventional Radiology · Aortic interventions · Contemporary classification
Endoleak Types I–V
Classification of persistent aneurysm-sac perfusion or pressurisation following endovascular aortic repair, based on the underlying source.
Purpose
To identify the mechanism of aneurysm-sac perfusion or expansion after EVAR or TEVAR and guide the urgency and type of management.
| Type | Mechanism | Source or subtype | Key implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| I — Attachment-site leak | Failure of the endograft to seal against the vessel wall | IA: proximal attachment site; IB: distal attachment site; IC: around an iliac occluder | Direct systemic-pressure communication; prompt correction is generally required |
| II — Branch-vessel endoleak | Retrograde flow from patent aortic or iliac side branches into the aneurysm sac | Common sources include lumbar arteries and the inferior mesenteric artery | Usually observed unless persistent and associated with clinically significant sac expansion |
| III — Endograft failure | Loss of integrity between or through endograft components | IIIA: modular component separation; IIIB: fabric disruption or tear | Direct systemic-pressure communication; prompt correction is generally required |
| IV — Graft porosity | Blood passage through otherwise intact porous graft fabric | Typically detected during or shortly after endograft deployment | Usually transient and uncommon with contemporary devices |
| V — Endotension | Aneurysm-sac expansion without a demonstrable endoleak on available imaging | No visible source of sac perfusion | Diagnosis of exclusion; investigate for an occult Type I, II or III endoleak |
How to use it
- Types I and III directly expose the aneurysm sac to systemic arterial pressure and are considered high-risk endoleaks.
- Type II is the most frequent endoleak and results from retrograde collateral-vessel flow rather than failure of an attachment site.
- Type IV represents graft-fabric porosity and is principally an early post-deployment phenomenon.
- Type V describes progressive sac enlargement without a visible endoleak and should prompt a search for an occult leak using appropriate multiphasic or problem-solving imaging.
Common mistake
Do not label every peripheral sac-enhancement focus as Type II: enhancement adjacent to a proximal or distal seal zone or between graft components must raise concern for a higher-pressure Type I or III endoleak.
Exam pearl
Remember the mechanism sequence: seal failure, side branches, structural failure, porosity and endotension correspond to Types I–V.
Viva questions
- What is an endoleak?
- An endoleak is persistent blood flow outside the endograft lumen but within the treated aneurysm sac or adjacent excluded vascular segment after endovascular aortic repair.
- Enumerate the five types of endoleak.
- Type I is attachment-site seal failure, Type II is retrograde branch-vessel flow, Type III is structural endograft failure, Type IV is graft porosity and Type V is sac expansion without a visible leak, termed endotension.
- What are the subtypes of a Type I endoleak?
- Type IA arises at the proximal attachment site, Type IB at the distal attachment site and Type IC around an iliac occluder.
- What are the usual sources of a Type II endoleak?
- It usually results from retrograde flow through patent lumbar arteries or the inferior mesenteric artery; other collateral branches may also contribute.
- Differentiate Type IIIA from Type IIIB endoleak.
- Type IIIA is caused by separation or inadequate overlap of modular endograft components, whereas Type IIIB results from disruption or tearing of the graft fabric.
- Which endoleak types generally require prompt treatment?
- Types I and III generally require prompt correction because they provide direct systemic-pressure communication with the aneurysm sac and increase the risk of sac expansion and rupture.
- What is a Type V endoleak?
- Type V endoleak, or endotension, is progressive aneurysm-sac expansion without a demonstrable endoleak on available imaging. It is a diagnosis of exclusion after searching for an occult Type I, II or III leak.
- What is the major imaging pitfall when diagnosing a Type II endoleak?
- A low-flow Type I or III endoleak may mimic or coexist with a Type II leak. The seal zones and component junctions must therefore be assessed carefully, particularly when the aneurysm sac is enlarging.
Sources
- CIRSE Standards of Practice on Management of Endoleaks Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair · CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology · 2024
- Reporting Standards for Endovascular Aortic Repair of Aneurysms Involving the Renal-Mesenteric Arteries · Journal of Vascular Surgery · 2021
- European Society for Vascular Surgery 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · 2024