Obstetric and Gynaecological · Uterine leiomyoma reporting · 1.1
FIGO leiomyoma subclassification (types 0-8)
The FIGO three-tier system locating uterine leiomyomas as types 0-8 by their relationship to the endometrium and serosa, used to standardise reporting and guide hysteroscopic, surgical and interventional treatment selection.
Purpose
To provide a standardised, purely anatomical description of where each uterine leiomyoma sits relative to the endometrium and the serosa, within the leiomyoma ('L') component of the FIGO PALM-COEIN classification of abnormal uterine bleeding. The system does not grade size, number or vascularity; its value is that the assigned type directly predicts whether a lesion is hysteroscopically resectable, suitable for laparoscopic or open myomectomy, or a good target for uterine artery embolisation.
| Type | FIGO tier-2 group | Anatomical descriptor and definition | Reporting and management implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Submucous (SM) | Pedunculated intracavitary; entirely within the endometrial cavity with no myometrial component | Most amenable to hysteroscopic resection; state stalk width and craniocaudal position (prolapse risk) |
| 1 | Submucous (SM) | Submucosal with less than 50% of the lesion intramural | Usually hysteroscopically resectable in a single sitting |
| 2 | Submucous (SM) | Submucosal with 50% or more of the lesion intramural | Document outer free margin to serosa in millimetres; higher risk of incomplete resection, perforation and fluid overload, so a staged approach may be needed |
| 3 | Other (O) | Intramural with endometrial contact; entirely intramural but abutting the endometrium without cavity distortion | Endometrial contact is relevant to bleeding and fertility; document outer free margin |
| 4 | Other (O) | Intramural; entirely within the myometrium, contacting neither endometrium nor serosa | Typical target for myomectomy or uterine artery embolisation; document outer free margin |
| 5 | Other (O) | Subserosal with 50% or more of the lesion intramural | Report relationship to serosa; deeper myometrial defect at myomectomy |
| 6 | Other (O) | Subserosal with less than 50% of the lesion intramural | Laparoscopic approach usually feasible |
| 7 | Other (O) | Subserosal pedunculated; attached to the serosa by a stalk | Distinguish from a solid adnexal mass by identifying the bridging vascular stalk; consider torsion |
| 8 | Other (O) | Non-myometrial location, such as cervical, broad-ligament or parasitic leiomyoma | Specify the actual site in text; anticipate atypical or extrauterine arterial supply before embolisation |
| Hybrid (e.g. 2-5) | Transmural (SM and O) | Lesion contacting both endometrium and serosa; two digits separated by a hyphen, the first for the endometrial relationship and the second for the serosal relationship | Report both digits; predicts a transmural defect at myomectomy |
How to use it
- The system has three tiers: first, whether a leiomyoma is present at all; second, submucous (SM) versus 'other' (O); and third, the numerical type 0-8 based on the relationship to endometrium and serosa. 'Other' is therefore a formal FIGO tier-2 label for types 3-8, not a vague catch-all, and should be paired with the anatomical descriptor (intramural, subserosal) in a report.
- The submucous versus other split exists because submucosal location is most strongly associated with abnormal uterine bleeding and is the main determinant of hysteroscopic resectability.
- Types 1 and 2 are separated by the intramural proportion: type 1 has less than 50% intramural extension and type 2 has 50% or more, so type 2 carries the greater risk of incomplete hysteroscopic resection.
- For types 2, 3 and 4 the outer free margin between the lesion and the serosa should be documented in millimetres, because this margin governs the safety of hysteroscopic and other procedural approaches.
- The classification is anatomical only: it does not encode size, number, vascularity or degeneration, so a complete report must add three-dimensional size, lesion number, position and uterine volume alongside the FIGO type.
Common mistake
Assigning a single number to a lesion that reaches both the endometrium and the serosa; such transmural lesions require hybrid two-digit notation, and reporting one surface only underestimates the surgical defect. Two further recurrent errors are confusing types 1 and 2 by quoting the submucosal rather than the intramural proportion, and reporting a type 7 pedunculated subserosal fibroid as an adnexal mass because the bridging vascular stalk was not sought.
Exam pearl
Submucous group = 0, 1, 2; everything else is FIGO 'other' = 3 to 8. Type 3 touches the endometrium, type 4 touches nothing, type 5 and 6 are subserosal split at 50% intramural, type 7 is pedunculated subserosal, type 8 is non-myometrial (cervical, broad ligament, parasitic).
Viva questions
- What does the 'L' in PALM-COEIN represent, and how is it structured?
- L stands for leiomyoma, one of the structural PALM causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. It has three tiers: presence of a leiomyoma, then submucous versus other, then the numerical type 0 to 8 based on the lesion's relationship to the endometrium and the serosa.
- Why are types 3 to 8 grouped as 'other'?
- Because the classification was designed for abnormal uterine bleeding, and submucosal lesions are the ones most strongly associated with bleeding and amenable to hysteroscopic treatment. Everything without a submucosal component falls into the FIGO 'other' group, which anatomically comprises intramural types 3 and 4, subserosal types 5 to 7, and non-myometrial type 8.
- Define FIGO types 0, 1 and 2.
- All are submucous. Type 0 is pedunculated and entirely intracavitary with no myometrial component, type 1 has less than fifty per cent intramural extension, and type 2 has fifty per cent or more intramural extension.
- How do you distinguish type 3 from type 4?
- Both are entirely intramural. Type 3 abuts the endometrium without distorting the cavity, whereas type 4 contacts neither the endometrium nor the serosa.
- For which types must the outer free margin be documented, and why?
- Types 2, 3 and 4. The distance in millimetres from the lesion to the serosa determines the safety of hysteroscopic resection and the risk of perforation, and guides the choice of procedural approach.
- What is a hybrid leiomyoma and how is it written?
- A lesion contacting both the endometrium and the serosa. It is written as two numbers separated by a hyphen, for example 2-5, where by convention the first digit describes the endometrial relationship and the second the serosal relationship.
- What is the pitfall with a type 7 leiomyoma, and what does type 8 mean for an interventional radiologist?
- A pedunculated subserosal fibroid can be mistaken for a solid adnexal mass; the bridging vascular stalk on Doppler or MRI confirms uterine origin. Type 8 lesions such as cervical, broad-ligament or parasitic fibroids sit outside the myometrium and may derive supply from vessels other than the uterine arteries, which must be sought before embolisation.
- What does the FIGO leiomyoma system deliberately not capture?
- It is purely anatomical. It does not encode fibroid size, number, vascularity or degeneration, so the report must add three-dimensional measurements, lesion count, position and uterine volume for treatment planning.
Sources
- The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions · International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee) · 2018
- FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age · International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2011
- Smooth Muscle Tumors of the Uterus at MRI: Focus on Leiomyomas and FIGO Classification · RadioGraphics · 2023
- Reporting of uterine fibroids on ultrasound examinations: an illustrated report template focused on surgical planning · Radiologia Brasileira · 2023