Obstetric and Gynaecological · Uterine leiomyoma reporting · 1.1

FIGO leiomyoma subclassification (types 0-8)

The FIGO three-tier system locating uterine leiomyomas as types 0-8 by their relationship to the endometrium and serosa, used to standardise reporting and guide hysteroscopic, surgical and interventional treatment selection.

Purpose

To provide a standardised, purely anatomical description of where each uterine leiomyoma sits relative to the endometrium and the serosa, within the leiomyoma ('L') component of the FIGO PALM-COEIN classification of abnormal uterine bleeding. The system does not grade size, number or vascularity; its value is that the assigned type directly predicts whether a lesion is hysteroscopically resectable, suitable for laparoscopic or open myomectomy, or a good target for uterine artery embolisation.

TypeFIGO tier-2 groupAnatomical descriptor and definitionReporting and management implication
0Submucous (SM)Pedunculated intracavitary; entirely within the endometrial cavity with no myometrial componentMost amenable to hysteroscopic resection; state stalk width and craniocaudal position (prolapse risk)
1Submucous (SM)Submucosal with less than 50% of the lesion intramuralUsually hysteroscopically resectable in a single sitting
2Submucous (SM)Submucosal with 50% or more of the lesion intramuralDocument outer free margin to serosa in millimetres; higher risk of incomplete resection, perforation and fluid overload, so a staged approach may be needed
3Other (O)Intramural with endometrial contact; entirely intramural but abutting the endometrium without cavity distortionEndometrial contact is relevant to bleeding and fertility; document outer free margin
4Other (O)Intramural; entirely within the myometrium, contacting neither endometrium nor serosaTypical target for myomectomy or uterine artery embolisation; document outer free margin
5Other (O)Subserosal with 50% or more of the lesion intramuralReport relationship to serosa; deeper myometrial defect at myomectomy
6Other (O)Subserosal with less than 50% of the lesion intramuralLaparoscopic approach usually feasible
7Other (O)Subserosal pedunculated; attached to the serosa by a stalkDistinguish from a solid adnexal mass by identifying the bridging vascular stalk; consider torsion
8Other (O)Non-myometrial location, such as cervical, broad-ligament or parasitic leiomyomaSpecify the actual site in text; anticipate atypical or extrauterine arterial supply before embolisation
Hybrid (e.g. 2-5)Transmural (SM and O)Lesion contacting both endometrium and serosa; two digits separated by a hyphen, the first for the endometrial relationship and the second for the serosal relationshipReport both digits; predicts a transmural defect at myomectomy

How to use it

Common mistake

Assigning a single number to a lesion that reaches both the endometrium and the serosa; such transmural lesions require hybrid two-digit notation, and reporting one surface only underestimates the surgical defect. Two further recurrent errors are confusing types 1 and 2 by quoting the submucosal rather than the intramural proportion, and reporting a type 7 pedunculated subserosal fibroid as an adnexal mass because the bridging vascular stalk was not sought.

Exam pearl

Submucous group = 0, 1, 2; everything else is FIGO 'other' = 3 to 8. Type 3 touches the endometrium, type 4 touches nothing, type 5 and 6 are subserosal split at 50% intramural, type 7 is pedunculated subserosal, type 8 is non-myometrial (cervical, broad ligament, parasitic).

Viva questions

What does the 'L' in PALM-COEIN represent, and how is it structured?
L stands for leiomyoma, one of the structural PALM causes of abnormal uterine bleeding. It has three tiers: presence of a leiomyoma, then submucous versus other, then the numerical type 0 to 8 based on the lesion's relationship to the endometrium and the serosa.
Why are types 3 to 8 grouped as 'other'?
Because the classification was designed for abnormal uterine bleeding, and submucosal lesions are the ones most strongly associated with bleeding and amenable to hysteroscopic treatment. Everything without a submucosal component falls into the FIGO 'other' group, which anatomically comprises intramural types 3 and 4, subserosal types 5 to 7, and non-myometrial type 8.
Define FIGO types 0, 1 and 2.
All are submucous. Type 0 is pedunculated and entirely intracavitary with no myometrial component, type 1 has less than fifty per cent intramural extension, and type 2 has fifty per cent or more intramural extension.
How do you distinguish type 3 from type 4?
Both are entirely intramural. Type 3 abuts the endometrium without distorting the cavity, whereas type 4 contacts neither the endometrium nor the serosa.
For which types must the outer free margin be documented, and why?
Types 2, 3 and 4. The distance in millimetres from the lesion to the serosa determines the safety of hysteroscopic resection and the risk of perforation, and guides the choice of procedural approach.
What is a hybrid leiomyoma and how is it written?
A lesion contacting both the endometrium and the serosa. It is written as two numbers separated by a hyphen, for example 2-5, where by convention the first digit describes the endometrial relationship and the second the serosal relationship.
What is the pitfall with a type 7 leiomyoma, and what does type 8 mean for an interventional radiologist?
A pedunculated subserosal fibroid can be mistaken for a solid adnexal mass; the bridging vascular stalk on Doppler or MRI confirms uterine origin. Type 8 lesions such as cervical, broad-ligament or parasitic fibroids sit outside the myometrium and may derive supply from vessels other than the uterine arteries, which must be sought before embolisation.
What does the FIGO leiomyoma system deliberately not capture?
It is purely anatomical. It does not encode fibroid size, number, vascularity or degeneration, so the report must add three-dimensional measurements, lesion count, position and uterine volume for treatment planning.

Sources