Genitourinary · Prostate MRI · 1.0

PI-RADS v2.1: Prostate MRI assessment categories

Zone-specific scoring system for multiparametric prostate MRI that assigns an overall assessment category 1-5 reflecting the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Purpose

PI-RADS v2.1 standardises acquisition, interpretation and reporting of multiparametric prostate MRI in treatment-naive patients with suspected prostate cancer, and assigns each lesion an overall assessment category reflecting the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Overall categoryLikelihood of clinically significant cancerPeripheral zone (DWI is the dominant sequence)Transition zone (T2W is the dominant sequence)
PI-RADS 1Very lowDWI 1: no abnormality on ADC and high b-value imagesT2W 1: normal-appearing transition zone, or a round completely encapsulated nodule
PI-RADS 2LowDWI 2: indistinct hypointensity on ADCT2W 2: mostly encapsulated nodule, homogeneous circumscribed nodule without encapsulation, or a homogeneous mildly hypointense area between nodules
PI-RADS 3Intermediate (equivocal)DWI 3: focal mild or moderate hypointensity on ADC and isointense or mildly hyperintense on high b-value images; upgraded to 4 if DCE is positiveT2W 3: heterogeneous signal intensity with obscured margins; upgraded to 4 if DWI score is 5
PI-RADS 4HighDWI 4: focal markedly hypointense on ADC and markedly hyperintense on high b-value images, less than 1.5 cm in greatest dimensionT2W 4: lenticular or non-circumscribed, homogeneous, moderately hypointense, less than 1.5 cm in greatest dimension
PI-RADS 5Very highDWI 5: features of DWI 4 but 1.5 cm or larger, or with definite extraprostatic extension or invasive behaviourT2W 5: features of T2W 4 but 1.5 cm or larger, or with definite extraprostatic extension or invasive behaviour

How to use it

Common mistake

Treating PI-RADS as a histological or staging system, or scoring the peripheral zone off the T2-weighted images. PI-RADS categorises the likelihood of clinically significant cancer on a per-lesion basis; the peripheral zone is scored on DWI/ADC and the transition zone on T2W, and DCE never independently creates a category 4 or 5 lesion.

Exam pearl

Peripheral zone equals DWI dominant, transition zone equals T2 dominant; DCE only upgrades a peripheral-zone 3 to a 4, and 1.5 cm (or definite extraprostatic extension) is what turns a 4 into a 5.

Viva questions

What does PI-RADS v2.1 actually assess?
It assesses the likelihood that a lesion on multiparametric prostate MRI represents clinically significant prostate cancer, on a per-lesion five-point scale, in treatment-naive patients. It is not a histological grade and not a staging system.
Which sequence is dominant in each zone?
Diffusion-weighted imaging with the ADC map is dominant in the peripheral zone, and T2-weighted imaging is dominant in the transition zone.
What role does dynamic contrast enhancement play in v2.1?
It is binary. A positive DCE study upgrades a peripheral-zone DWI score of 3 to an overall category 4. It does not upgrade transition-zone lesions and never independently produces a category 5.
How is a transition-zone T2 score of 3 handled?
A transition-zone lesion scored T2W 3 is upgraded to overall category 4 when the DWI score is 5; otherwise it remains category 3.
What separates category 4 from category 5?
Size of 1.5 cm or more in greatest dimension, or definite extraprostatic extension or invasive behaviour, moves an otherwise category 4 lesion to category 5.
How should a suspicious lesion be measured?
Measure the greatest dimension on the axial image of the sequence that determined the score, that is the ADC map for peripheral-zone lesions and T2-weighted images for transition-zone lesions. If the largest dimension is on a sagittal or coronal image, report that value and state the plane.
Name the key technical requirements introduced or tightened in v2.1.
High b-value imaging of at least 1400 s/mm2, acquired or calculated from lower b-values, DWI slice thickness of 3 mm or less with no gap, and dynamic contrast-enhanced temporal resolution of 15 seconds or less.
What is the commonest interpretive pitfall with PI-RADS?
Scoring the wrong dominant sequence for the zone, or using positive DCE to justify a category 4 or 5 transition-zone lesion. A further pitfall is quoting a PI-RADS category as if it were a Gleason grade or a stage.

Sources