About RadioQBank

Why RadioQBank exists

Preparing for the radiology super-specialty entrances exposes a specific gap: image-rich, exam-paced practice material for NEET-SS, and especially for the more concept-driven INI-SS paper, is scattered across recalled-question PDFs, coaching notes of uneven accuracy, and general-purpose question banks that treat radiology as an afterthought. RadioQBank was built from the ground up in 2026 to close that gap: a single bank written at exam register, with the marking schemes, timing, and image emphasis of the actual papers.

Medical & Editorial Leadership

RadioQBank is built and clinically reviewed by practising radiologists. The same physicians responsible for its editorial direction are directly involved in developing and reviewing its educational content.

Dr. Bharath Korrapati, Founder and Administrator, holds an MD in Radiodiagnosis from AIIMS Bhubaneswar and an MBBS from Sri Venkateshwara Medical College, Tirupati, and has cleared USMLE Step 1 and Step 2 CK. His residency carried substantial hands-on interventional work, including independent image-guided biopsies, PTBD and biliary stenting alongside vascular procedures such as DSA and femoral and jugular access. That experience is why the bank runs unusually deep on interventional radiology. He authors the questions, explanations, Library entries, IR playbooks and exam guides on this site, and is responsible for its sourcing standards, reported corrections and day-to-day editorial decisions.

Dr. Ankita G. Cheleng, Co-Administrator, is a radiologist with advanced training in neuroradiology and neurointervention. She completed her MBBS at Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences and her MD in Radiodiagnosis at Sri Lakshmi Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, followed by post-doctoral training in neuroradiology and neurointervention at AIIMS Bhubaneswar. Her clinical work centres on CT and MRI interpretation, neurovascular imaging and imaging-based decision making. She combines specialist radiology expertise with healthcare entrepreneurship as the owner of a diagnostic imaging centre in Margherita, Assam. One of its kind in the district, the centre brings high-quality imaging closer to home for the communities she serves.

Within RadioQBank, Dr. Cheleng shares clinical, editorial and educational oversight of the platform with the founder: she takes part in content-development decisions, reviews stems, answer keys and explanations for ambiguity or inaccuracy, and leads specialist review of neuroradiology, neurovascular and neurointerventional material.

Editorial leadership and governance

The two administrators jointly hold the platform’s educational direction, editorial standards, content quality and continued development. In practice that means deciding what gets written and in what depth, agreeing the sourcing standard every explanation must meet, ruling on ambiguous or contested items, and deciding when existing material is retired or rewritten rather than patched.

Editorial judgements are made on the medicine and on the evidence. No question, explanation, Library entry or playbook on this site is sponsored, and no third party pays for placement or influences clinical content.

The editorial standard: zero fabrication

Every explanation in the bank is sourced to the standard literature: Grainger & Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology (7th ed), Osborn’s Brain (3rd ed), the AIIMS-MAMC-PGI review series, ACR Appropriateness Criteria, or primary journal literature (Radiographics, AJR, AJNR, Radiology). The citation is shown with the question. No invented references, no unsourced percentages.

The same policy applies to the exam guides on this site: every date, cutoff, and seat figure is labelled with its cycle and its official source (NBEMS, AIIMS exam section, MCC), and where a number has not been officially released we say "data pending" rather than publishing a plausible guess. Each guide displays a visible last-verified date tied to its structured-data dateModified field.

How content is developed and reviewed

Material moves through a deliberate sequence rather than going straight from draft to publication:

Not every item requires subspecialty review. Specialist review is used for material where additional expertise measurably improves accuracy or educational value: image-based questions, subspecialty-specific classifications, procedural content, and anything where the discriminating detail between two close differentials is doing the teaching.

• Content is written against its primary sources.
• Editorial review checks accuracy, clarity, exam register, a single defensible answer, and citation quality.
• Where subspecialty expertise helps, the item goes to specialist medical review.
• On publication the item carries its reference and, where applicable, its review date.
• After publication it stays open to correction and revision.

Medical review

Specialist medical review is applied where subspecialty expertise adds to the accuracy or teaching value of an item. Dr. Ankita G. Cheleng’s specialist review covers neuroradiology, neurovascular imaging, neurointervention and CNS imaging generally, including the relevant CT and MRI interpretation, neurovascular classification systems, treatment-related imaging and post-procedural appearances, and the image-based questions and Library entries that sit within these areas.

That review looks at the whole item, not just the answer key: whether the stem is unambiguous, whether the stated correct answer is genuinely the single best one, whether the important differentials are addressed, whether the imaging terminology is current, and whether the explanation reflects accepted radiological practice rather than a single textbook’s phrasing.

We do not claim that every item on the platform has passed subspecialty review, and the site does not display a per-question reviewer credit. Where specialist review has shaped an item, it has done so through the process described above.

Evidence standards

Educational material is developed and reviewed against appropriate authoritative sources: major radiology textbooks; peer-reviewed literature; radiology and clinical society guidelines; consensus statements; the major clinical trials that changed practice; established classification, staging and reporting systems; and evidence-based practice recommendations. Where a topic is genuinely contested, the explanation says so instead of presenting one side as settled.

Evidence, classifications, terminology and guidelines move, and material on this site is expected to move with them. A published item is a current best statement, not a permanent one.

Corrections and continuous review

RadioQBank treats its educational content as continuously reviewable rather than permanently fixed. Factual errors are corrected; ambiguous questions are revised or withdrawn; outdated recommendations are updated; classifications and terminology are brought into line when the standards change; specialist reviewers may recommend revisions to existing material; and user feedback on any item can trigger a re-review.

To report an error, email support@radiologyqbank.com with the question ID or the page link. Verified corrections are prioritised over new content; challenging the bank is the fastest way to improve it.

What the platform is

As of 20 August 2026 the bank holds 3,900+ published MCQs across 13 subspecialties: neuroradiology, chest, GI and hepatobiliary, genitourinary, women’s imaging, MSK, breast, paediatric, interventional radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging physics, emergency, and cardiac radiology. They are practised through topic-wise, timed-exam, full-length mock, and spaced-repetition modes with per-subspecialty analytics.

Alongside the question bank sit three reference layers: the Radiology Library (160+ sourced entries covering landmark evidence, classifications, and quick-reference packages), 69 IR procedure playbooks, and a Viva Hub that turns both into oral-exam practice by specialty and by IR system. Radiology Spotters cover the image-recognition half of MD/DNB practicals. A free tier (registration only, no payment details) lets you evaluate the quality before paying anything, and a large share of the Library, the playbooks and the sample MCQs is published openly on the site.

Contact

Email: support@radiologyqbank.com. Instagram: @radiologyqbank. For corrections to any factual claim on this site, including question explanations, email with the page link; verified corrections are prioritised over new content.

Keep preparing